News feed: Minorities meet to consider online filtering and blocking

As concern grows that filtering and blocking by internet service providers and mobile companies may be disproportionately targeting minority groups, organisations affected will be meeting with MP’s in parliament today to assess the scale of the problem and look at ways to make companies that filter more accountable.

Central to today’s meeting will be claims that filtering systems are disproportionately blocking sites with the least connection to the LGBT community, as well as sites dealing with sex education, violence against women and child abuse.

The meeting will also look at whether the present filtering system is adequately regulated.

The meeting is organised by journalist and campaigner, Jane Fae, who said: “According to David Cameron, filtering is so important that if companies fail to implement it, government is prepared to force them to do so through legislation.

“However, this supposedly vital protection for the nation’s children has been handed over to a bunch of commercial interests, based for the most part in the United States – one of just two countries worldwide that refuses to recognise the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

“There is no transparency to the solutions applied – and a strong suspicion that these systems systematically block access to the very sites that vulnerable children most need to access. The excuse that every single block of an LGBT site was a one-off or mistake is beginning to wear thin.”

Jane added: “As far as supervision of this system is concerned, that task appears to have been delegated to a sub-committee of the UK Council for Child Internet Safety (UKCCIS).

“That body, which is heavily skewed towards representing commercial interests and lacks any significant technological expertise in this area has met just once – some weeks after the new blocking regime was set up.

“Government claims that this is an important issue: yet unlike every single other form of censorship in the UK, it is not subject to regulation or independent oversight.

“I believe it is time for government to consider the licensing of filtering solutions – and to refuse licenses to any organisation that fails to explain its filtering adequately or is in breach of basic UK legislation, such as the Equality Act 2010.”

Amongst the two dozen organisations coming together to discuss these issues are London Friend and Stonewall, organisations concerned with sex education and abuse, and representatives from relevant trade bodies. MP’s Kate Green, Caroline Lucas and John Leech have indicated an interest in this meeting, which is sponsored by Julian Huppert, Lib Dem MP for Cambridge, who will open the meeting by setting out his own views on the subject: it is endorsed by publications GayStarNews and Diva

* * * * * * * * * * *

For further information, contact Jane Fae on 07780 994646 or e-mail Jane on


About janefae

On my way from here to there
This entry was posted in News Feed and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to News feed: Minorities meet to consider online filtering and blocking

  1. mark says:

    I disaprove of the filters for all the said reason’s, also because even if it did work it dose not make scence to block the whole house hold just for the child’s computer need’s, they could save money making a campain telling parent’s how to install filter’s or monitering software for themself’s, also please look at google’s supervised user program which is still in the beta stage but i a real tool for the parent’s that will still protect children but will alow a parent to go to lovefilm to watch saw 2, which would be important if you were a film critic.

  2. RedGrouper says:

    There is no point in asking for someone to monitor the filtering. That is just adding an additional layer unnecessary regulation onto the existing one. At some point people will feel that the filtering regulator is not doing its job properly and they will need to overseen by someone else. The Obscene publications Act was used disproportionately against gay literature so why do you think a Government body is going to improve the conduct of the ISPs?
    A better stance would be to argue that the Government should abandon their misguided filtering policy and less households make up their minds about what goes into their homes.
    Please read my blog which I wrote last summer. I predicted the existing problems and some more which are yet to come.
    Free speech is either something you have or something you don’t have. There is not a half measure.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s